It's heavily ironic that you see Jamie Raskin and others speaking in these constitutional terms when, functionally, USAID has been operating outside congressional oversight and specific appropriations as to what they are doing for decades,
I think everyone in the world knows exactly what USAID is, no matter what part of the political spectrum they are on,
While we don’t agree on all issues, we wholeheartedly agree that USAID and America’s foreign assistance programs are vital to our interests, that the career men and women of USAID have served each of us well, and that it is the duty of the Administration and Congress to swiftly protect the Agency’s statutory role,
Failure to maintain the global engagement that foreign aid enables, to honor the men and women of our civilian service as we do those in the military, or weaken and even destroy the Agency is to the benefit of neither political party and the detriment of all Americans,
USAID may move, reorganize, and integrate certain missions, bureaus, and offices into the Department of State, and the remainder of the Agency may be abolished consistent with applicable law,
Congress needs to stand up and defend USAid. Conservatives have told us that they care about these issues for years,
This is showing that you can do a slash-and-burn to the American governmental apparatus, including foreign aid,
We are the moral force of the world,
It puts us and the world in danger in a way it never has before,
You know that what is being said about USAid is not true,
This is a dictatorship in the making,
It’s enormous – it affects all Americans, ... In global emergencies, they’re the first responders. [After earthquakes and tsunamis], they’re the ones who are there first. You see airplanes offloading supplies that say ‘from the American people’.”
We are in a very, very dire place,
Let us work!” ... USAid! USAid!”
What’s happening is unconstitutional and illegal,
This is an example” of what the Trump administration can do to agencies like the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA
I think the fidelity to Trump changed,
USAID has so many things that, the truth is, yes, it is better they close it. And that, in any case, if there is going to be aid for different types, they should open other types of channels; that they be transparent, that is the issue, the big issue,
The elimination of these programs would not only harm individuals and groups in Mexico but could undermine the current administration’s approach to migration, weakening efforts to address the root causes of migration, such as crime and insecurity,
While marketed as support for development, democracy, and human rights, the majority of these funds are funneled into opposition groups, NGOs with political agendas, and destabilizing movements,